thank you for smoking (sometimes) 11 December 2006
Posted by DSM in Alberta, Canada, politics.comments closed
The inconsistencies of today’s Canada demand some difficult mental gymnastics from the faithful, which I as a sceptic haven’t yet mastered. So it’s handy to have the line between good and doubleplusungood so helpfully indicated!
I hope the approach catches on. I’d definitely be interested in having a poster discussing the Canadian Wheat Board, which explains why farmers in Ontario and Quebec having the right to market their own grain is a natural freedom but farmers in the West having the right to market their own grain is a danger to us all.
And with the recent victory of Citoyen Dion (heh; wish I’d thought of that), this may be a live issue.
Hat-tip Cosh.
one out of two ain’t bad 3 December 2006
Posted by DSM in Alberta, politics.comments closed
One the one hand, I was surprised by this:
Flanked by the man whose shadow he will now attempt to step out of, Alberta’s Premier-designate Ed Stelmach made his first speech as the province’s leader early Sunday morning following his surprise victory.
Oh, well. He’s far too establishment for my tastes, and this may lead to a fragmentation of the party. This could be a very good thing: parties in power tend to become less conservative over time, and more interested in Liberal-style patronage and shady investments and buying off the voters with their own money, and I think the long PC reign contributed to its recent unimpressive performance. Having a real conservative party to compete with would be good for all concerned. (Remember, kids: Ralph Klein isn’t a conservative, whatever nonsense you’ve been fed by Ontario newspapers.)
On the other hand, I’m entirely unsurprised by this (hat-tip Reynolds):
Scientists at the U.K.’s Atomic Weapons Establishment in Aldermaston, west of London, have traced the polonium 210 found in London to a nuclear power plant in Russia, the capital’s Evening Standard newspaper reported today. Officials at the establishment didn’t return calls.
Although, to be fair, in the early phases of investigations there tend to be false positives on all sorts of tests, and associated inflated claims of both precision and accuracy in the analysis process. Finger-pointing like this has a habit of being quietly walked back later when no one’s looking, and in this case the finger hasn’t even been officially pointed, so for all we know someone got a glimpse of a list of samples they were comparing it to and decided to call up his cousin at the Evening Standard with a “scoop”.
Still.. I think I’ll call it a draw.
a cool-headed man 28 November 2006
Posted by DSM in Alberta, politics.comments closed
Ted Morton, our preferred candidate in the race for leadership of the Alberta PC party, came in a strong second on the first ballot. He still has an excellent chance to win.
Note that the second ballot is the final one: it’s a three-candidate rank-preference ballot, and if no one has more than 50% of the number one rankings, then the third candidate is scratched. It seems to me likely that most of the third-candidate (Stelmach) voters will put Morton in second. The Politic has an interesting graph with the results broken down by riding, which meshes quite nicely with my memories of the lay of the political land, and some intelligent commentary on both sides of the issue.
I should say that I agree with Lorne Gunter’s comments on Dinning: he’d probably be passably fine as a premier, though not so distinctively Albertan, and is currently suffering from front-runner syndrome. But Albertans don’t have to settle for hopes of adequacy, and why miss the chance to annoy Globe and Mail readers at the same time?
I hope that a Morton administration would find a place for Dinning somewhere, though, he has proven competence.
BTW, the title comes from Morton’s country campaign theme song. No, I’m not kidding; give it a listen.
Right now I’m missing home a lot..
what the West doesn’t know 22 October 2006
Posted by DSM in Alberta, Canada, politics.comments closed
Damian Penny (channelling Segacs) reminds us that the case of Paul Bryan is currently before the Court (thinking about it at the moment, I believe), where he’s appealing his conviction for violating section 329 of the Canada Elections Act by posting early results from Atlantic Canada on the Web. S329 forbids this, to ensure that voters in the West don’t stay home because it’s already clear who’s going to form the government.
I agree that this law is a violation of free expression, both useless and unnecessary. Useless, because anyone with Web access could follow the returns from American news sites or bloggers with an interest in Canada with a history of publishing material banned in the North and annoying the government. Unnecessary, because as Penny suggests the government could avoid the whole problem if it chose by simply delaying the start of the count. (As several commenters suggest, there are some logistical problems with that, but they’re pretty minor in the grand scheme of things.) Given the other options available, a regulation which punishes Canadians for writing what everyone who wants to know can find out elsewhere strikes me as (to borrow a phrase) ‘an uncommonly silly law’.
And I guess I agree that “voter turnout in Western Canada is depressed when Westerners find out the election has effectively been decided, regardless of how they vote.”
What I’m not sure about is whether that’s a problem.
Regardless of whether or not the numbers are released, the situation is the same: the election has effectively been decided before they vote. Shuffling the times around to bury this obvious truth isn’t going to change the situation, and Westerners know this. They know this all too well, and many (myself included) have supported Senate reform and increased provincial authority as a way to mitigate the resulting problems.
Maybe it’d be healthier for civic feeling if people didn’t have this made quite so clear, I admit, but the idea that the government should deliberately arrange things in the hopes that Canadians will forget the facts doesn’t seem too healthy either. I’m reminded of a conversation with a friend of mine who preferred taxes to be hidden and incorporated into sticker prices because he thought that continually reminding people that the government was taking our money led to anti-government sentiment. (He was a progressive socialist type, and wanted people to have warm and fuzzy feelings about redistribution.)
I’m actually more persuaded by the argument that the current setup gives the West an advantage over the East: by having more access to information, in theory Westerners could engage in tactical voting which the East couldn’t. In practice this would be almost impossible to pull off successfully and given the voting patterns of the country probably wouldn’t happen anyway, but it seems structurally unfair.
In the end, I’d repeal this part of the Act and change the vote counting process to ensure that all Canadians have access to the same information at the same time, but for a slightly different reason.
the King is dead; long live the King 5 October 2006
Posted by DSM in Alberta, politics.comments closed
Although I’ve been away from Alberta in distance for some time — and now even more so, being in London — she’s never far from my thoughts.
[Ed: Do you have the same kind of feelings for Canada?
DSM: No comment.
Ed: Oh, come on. You can do better than that.
DSM: Fine. My love for Canada is like a man's for his father, a love of respectful affection. My love for Alberta is like a man's for his wife, a crazy-drunk love that's forever amazed anything in all Creation could be so beautiful.
Ed: So why are you half a world away, then?
DSM: ...]
.. anyhow, for all those of you who have been waiting in breathless anticipation, I’ve made my decision. It wasn’t too hard.
I’m endorsing Ted Morton for the leadership of the Alberta Progressive Conservative party, and therefore for the premiership.
Every now and then I tried to explain Western politics to friends in Ontario, and they often got stuck at the point where I explained that there was a considerable groundswell of opposition to the Klein Conservatives.. from the right. By the end, many of us thought his goverment grew sloppy and lazy and nontransparent, and indulged in the same loose spending we deplored when other parties were engaging in it. “What? Lots of Albertans think Klein is too liberal?!“
In part this difficulty is due to a common misconception: Ralph Klein is not a conservative. Not in the sense that Edmund Burke is a conservative, not in the sense that WFB is a conservative, not even in the senses that Preston Manning or Stephen Harper are conservative. Klein is an idiosyncratic populist, in a conservative province. (I think I owe this formulation, or something like it, to one of the old Alberta Report writers, and usually when I remember a phrase it’s from Cosh. Genius steals, etc.)
Now I like Ralph a lot — he’s just so Ralph — but his ideological commitments to conservative principles are weak. He’s grown used to some of them over time, having seen them work, but a comparison of his record as mayor of Calgary to his record as provincial premier shows that he’s undergone, er, significant development of his policy ideas over the years. And when times were very good, like recently, and he could engage in unconservative actions without threatening the budgetary legacy he’d earned, he seized the chance.
Reminds me of a popular bumper sticker back home during the early ’90s. I can’t remember the precise wording, but (cleaned up somewhat for public viewing) it went something like this: “Lord, please send another boom: I promise not to [waste it all on beer] this time.” The boom came, and so should the fiscal restraint.
Ted Morton understands this. He’s been fighting the good fight for ages, even when it was unpopular, with consistent principle and painfully sharp clarity. If there were any justice, he’d be a Senator right now, but he can probably accomplish a lot more as a premier. Real reform, boldly and thoughtfully implemented.
Here’s hoping he gets the opportunity.
Stephen Taylor has an interview with Morton which is worth a listen.
[This message entirely unsponsored by the Morton campaign, more's the pity.]
why Ralph was king, reason #210 24 September 2006
Posted by DSM in Alberta, hockey.comments closed
Long-serving Alberta premier Ralph Klein on the benefits of retirement:
“Because the premier can’t be seen supporting one team over another, I’ve had to sit in the stands at the Labour Day Classic and the Battle of Alberta hockey games cheering like an idiot for both teams. It’s unnatural. It’s like living in Red Deer.”
I grew up in Red Deer, and even though he’s joking, Klein has a point. Being almost exactly between the two cities (Edmonton, official capital, and Calgary, spiritual capital), our affections are torn. During the Dynasty, there were lots of bandwagon fans, but I think it’s fair to say that Red Deer is closer to Calgary in heart. (For non-Canadian readers, references to ‘the Dynasty’ unmodified are always about the dominance of the Edmonton Oilers during the Gretzky and near-Gretzky era.)
For what it’s worth, Calgary’s long since been my second team, after God’s own team, the Toronto Maple Leafs. Blood is thicker than water, after all, and my father grew up in southern Ontario.
Hat-tip to Randy @ Idiot Strings.